ORDER reviewing this article MAGAZINES " Sports psychology "

ORDER reviewing this article MAGAZINES " Sports psychology "
Date: 
12/2013

ORDER reviewing this article MAGAZINES " Sports psychology "

1. This procedure applies to all incoming materials to the editor , including articles , reviews of publications, reviews of dissertations , interviews, etc. Not subject to scientific review informational materials : reports of conferences , anniversaries , obituaries , etc.
2 . Copyright directs Received item in accordance with the " Instructions to authors ", which is determined by the basic requirements for material requirements .
3 . Manuscripts that do not meet established requirements to publications are not registered and are not allowed to further consideration , as the authors are notified .
4 . Obligatory reviewing materials entrusted the chief editor or scientific magazine's editorial staff of the university 's leading specialists in the field of scientific knowledge, and if necessary, provided peer review , which is entrusted to those skilled ( doctor or PhD ) having specialization in content articles .
5 . Reviewing the manuscript shall be confidential . Names of reviewers not be disclosed .
6. Dates review determined the chief editor at his discretion. Maxi-mum review period - is no more than two months from receipt of manuscripts re - edited by the what the author of the material immediately informed by e-mail .
7. The decision to publish the editorial board takes on the basis of the submitted reviews , and the solution itself is reported to the author .
8. Reviewing carried out on a voluntary basis.
9. Requirements for review.
- Need to reflect that the content of the manuscript direction name and those magazine -Matic ;
- Relevance of the work , its scientific novelty and practical significance ;
- The validity of the conclusions and proposals ;
- Positive and weaknesses of the manuscript (specifying where and what corrections need to be made by the author) .
- The review should be completed by clear conclusions ( recommended for publication , modify , take inappropriate edition ) .
- Signature reviewer seal of the institution where he works, and put the date .
- Printed and electronic version of the review is sent to the journal .
10 . In the case where the reviewer does not recommend the article for publication , the editorial board may rule on the article to be rewritten , taking into account the comments made , as well as send it to another - the reviewers Zenta . Text negative review sent to the author on request.
11. In case of refusal to publish the article editor in chief directs author mochi - vated failure . Not allowed to publish an article for the following reasons :
- Mismatch profile of the journal and accepted requirements for publications ;
- Lack modified in accordance with the comments of the reviewer variant manuscripts BBC (or reasoned refutation observations) ;
- Low quality of scientific articles (including a lack of information in accordance with generally accepted structure of scientific articles, re-publication of scientific research;
- Infringe someone else's copyright or accepted norms of scientific ethics .
12. Modified version of the article, the author has to return to the editor no later than 2 weeks after receipt of comments . Failure to return the manuscript by the author to the editor - chenii expiration of this period, or need a longer time for completion , the initial da -ta its registration shall be canceled and the date of receipt shall be the date of the final receipt variants article. Articles finalized ( processed ) by the author re- sent for review -ing .
13. When a positive review the manuscript passed the chief editor ( or presiding Tieliu scientific editorial board ) for approval. If necessary, the decision of the feasibility and priority of publication after reviewing a simple majority of the board members .
14. Published out of turn :
- Articles, the editorial board recognized priority and highly significant for the improvement of sports and sports destinations in the Russian Federation ;
- Article requiring early publication for reasons affecting the interests and the priority right of authors , as well as articles accepted by the Editorial Board deserving attention the scientific community ( if the process does not require preparation of the manuscript substantial revision authors).
13. Reviewers, and the editorial staff are not entitled to use the information about the contents of the paper prior to its publication in their own interests . Manuscripts are the private property of the authors and are reportedly not subject to disclosure .
14. Manuscript accepted for publication and rejected , stored (along with reviews ) editorially archive for 3 years. Manuscripts will not be returned .
15. Review can be provided on request expert advice in the WAC of the Russian Federation .

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer